Article

The Effects of Fatty Acid Composition and Storage Conditions on the Oxidative Stability of Various Vegetable Seed Oils

Jin-Won Lee, Mi-Sook Seo1, Jang Woo Park2,*
Author Information & Copyright
Department of Food & Biotechnology, Hankyong National University
1Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Seoil Univeraity
2Department of Food & Biotechnology and Food and Bio-industrial Research Center, Hankyong National University
*Corresponding author: Jang Woo Park, Department of Food & Biotechnology and Food and Bio-industrial Research Center, Hankyong National University, 327 Jungang-ro, Anseong-Si, Gyeonggi-do 17579, Korea +82-31-678-4713 or +82-10-8990-4239: +82-31-677-0990jangwoo_park@hanmail.net

© Korean Society for Food Engineering. All rights reserved.

Received: Dec 27, 2016; Revised: Jan 24, 2017; Accepted: Jan 27, 2017

Abstract

Vegetable seed oils (VSOs) have been extracted and used not only as ingredients in food and as sources of dietary lipids, but also as sources of nutraceuticals used to overcome the various oxidative stresses that contribute to the development of diseases, including cancer and other chronic conditions. The chemical compositions and oxidative stabilities of various VSOs were therefore investigated; samples were stored for 35 d, with each oil having been tested under O2 exposure, sealed from O2 exposure and sealed from O2 exposure while containing O2 scavengers. Oxidative stability was evaluated by peroxide value (POV), p-anisidine value (p-AnV), iodine value (IV), and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) value. Perilla seed and flaxseed oil were mostly composed of linolenic acid (45.5% and 59.7%, respectively), whereas pine seed oil was mostly composed of linoleic acid (48.3%). Meanwhile, camellia seed and olive oils contained 80% oleic acid, which correlated strongly with oxidative stability. The POV, p-AnV, and TBA values were the highest under O2 exposure, and the lowest in the presence of O2 scavengers. These results indicate that VOS oxidative stability depends not only on storage conditions, but on unsaturated fatty acid profiles as well.

Keywords: oxidative stability; vegetable seed oil; storage conditions; unsaturated fatty acid composition; O2 scavenger system

Introduction

Vegetable seed oils (VSOs) have been extracted and used not only as ingredients in food and as sources of dietary lipids, but also as sources of nutraceuticals used to overcome the various oxidative stresses that contribute to the development of diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular ailment, and various chronic conditions (Concepcion et al., 1998; Wagner et al., 2000; DO, 2002; Bianchi et al., 2003; Marina et al., 2009). Many chemical and enzymatic changes occur in food, including off-flavoring, oxidative rancidity and hydrolysis; generally, VSOs are more susceptible to these oxidative changes than animal fats are due to their containing more unsaturated fatty acids. Various factors accelerate these chemical changes, such as air content, heat, light and the presence of trace metals and moisture (Wagner et al., 2000; DO, 2002; Lee et al., 2004; Yoon et al., 2008), leading to a loss of health benefits (Hasmadi et al., 2005). Several methods exist to inhibit this effect, including vacuum packaging, modified atmosphere packaging, refrigerating and freezing; overall, though, the addition of antioxidants is the most powerful way to retard this reaction (Lee et al., 2004).

Plants seeds generally contain a high number of these antioxidants, potentially making them resistant to this oxidative effect. Perilla seed and flaxseed oil are both primarily composed of α-linolenic acid, making them an important source of ω-3 fatty acids (Kurowska et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2004; Marina et al., 2009). Pine seed oil, on the other hand, is mainly comprised of linoleic acid, making it an ω-6 fatty acid source. Meanwhile, camellia seed and olive oil contain high amounts of oleic acid, which could make them particularly susceptible to oxidative rancidity (Bianchi et al., 2003; Mateos et al., 2005; Long et al., 2008). However, olive oil is also particularly rich in antioxidant polyphenols and flavonoids (Mateos et al., 2005; Josiah et al., 2016).

In order to better investigate the effect of varying unsaturated fatty acid composition on oxidative stability, this study aimed to compare acid composition for various VSOs and to determine stability while accounting for different storage conditions.

Materials and Method

Materials

Perilla, camellia and pine seeds were purchased from a local market (Agricultural Marketing Center, Seoul, Korea), while olives and flaxseeds were purchased from an Agricultural Market (Tokyo, Japan).

Extraction conditions and sample preparation

Vegetable seeds were roasted in an electric roaster (EL-24, Dongbang Machine Co., Daejeon, Korea) for 15 min under constant stirring and at temperatures up to 190 °C; this roasting temperature was commonly used because it provided a high yield and a desirable flavor. The roasted seeds were then immediately moved into a mechanical press (DB-3000, Dongbang Machine Co., Daejeon, Korea) and pressed at 700 kgf/cm2 for 10 min to obtain the VSOs. Moisture, crude fat, crude protein and ash composition were then determined using the AOAC method (AOAC, 1980).

Fatty acid analysis

The VSOs (5 g) were saponified by refluxing in 500 mL of 1.25 N NaOH solution in 95% ethanol for 30 min. After the solution was cooled down, 200 mL of 2 N HCl was added and the solution was mixed vigorously. The mixture was extracted twice with 500 mL hexane, which was then washed with water until neutral pH was achieved. The hexane layer was dried over Na2SO4, after which fatty acids were recovered through rotary evaporation and subjected purging with N2. 4 mL of BF3-methanol was added to the fatty acids to yield fatty acids methyl esters which were extracted with n-hexane. Then, 1 μL aliquots of the extracts were injected into a gas chromatograph (GC) (Varian 3800, Varian, Walnut Creek, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector and a fused silica capillary Supelcowax-10 GC column (30 m × 0.32 mm i.d.; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The injector, oven and detector temperatures were 240, 190 and 260°C, respectively. Fatty acid analysis was conducted in triplicate for each sample; each trial was conducted separately from the others. VSO fatty acid composition was determined using a GC (Agilent 6890 Plus, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a fused silica capillary supelcowax-10 GC column and coupled to a mass spectrometer (5973N GC-MSD, Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipment with Mass Lab. Helium was used as the carrier gas which was set to a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injector temperature was set to 250 °C; samples were injected under the same conditions as reported in earlier work (Heliana de Azevedo et al., 2003). Spectra were recorded at an electron energy of 70 eV and an ion source temperature of 270 °C, and were compared with available data in mass spectra libraries.

Determination of VSO oxidative stabilities

First, multiple 50 g samples of each VSO were transferred to their own glass bottles and stored at 30, 37 or 45 °C for 35 d. Samples at each temperature were left open to O2 exposure, sealed to prevent O2 exposure, sealed and stored with O2 scavenger; O2-Zero (TPG, Gimpo, Korea). All samples were stored in the dark. Aliquots from each sample were extracted after shaking the respective bottles and were analysed for peroxide value (POV) (Hasmadi et al., 2005), p-anisidine value (p-AnV) (Marina et al., 2009), iodine value (IV) and thiobarbituric acid (TBA) value after 1, 3, 7, 9, 12, 15, 18, 25, 28 and 33 d. Every measurement was performed three times.

POV determination

POV was determined according to an established AOCS International procedure (Hasmadi et al., 2005). The sample (3 g) was weighed in a 250 mL glass Erlenmeyer flask equipped with a stopper and was then thoroughly agitated for 3 min in 30 mL of an acetic acid-chloroform solution (3:2, v/v) until total dissolution was achieved. The samples were then vacuum filtered to remove the VSOs. Saturated potassium iodide solution (0.5 mL) was added to the filtrate, which was then transferred into the burette of an automatic titrator equipped with a stirrer. The sample was titrated against a standard solution of sodium thiosulfate (25 g/L). POV is calculated and expressed in milliequivalents (meq) of peroxide per kg of oil which was calculated according to the following formula:

POV = ((S - B) ×N thiosulfate×1000)/weight of sample

where, S is titration of sample and B is titration of blank solution.

IV determination

The extent of saturation of fatty acid samples was measured using IV (AOCS, 1990). The sample (0.1- 0.3 g) was weighed in a flask then was thoroughly agitated for 3 min in a solution composed of 10 mL chloroform and 25 mL Wijs solution until total dissolution. An excess of iodine monochloride contained in the Wijs solution was allowed to react with the double bonds in the sample, after which any unreacted halide was titrated with 10% sodium thiosulfate. IV is therefore calculated and expressed as reacted iodine per g of sample.

IV =(((V 0 -V 1 )×0.01269×N thiosulfate)/weight of sample)

where, V0 is titration of blank solution and V1 is titration sample.

p- AnV determination

Formation of secondary oxidation products was measured by p-AnV according to a previously published procedure (Marina, 2009). The sample (0.5 g) was weighed in a flask and was thoroughly agitated for 10 min in a solution composed of 5 mL iso-octane and 5 mL p-anisidine until total dissolution. Absorbance at 350 nm was then measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Optizen POP, Mecasys Co. Ltd., Daejeon, Korea). The p-AnV was calculated using the following equation:

Anisidine value ( p = AnV ) =25×((1 .2A s )-A b )/weight of sample

where, As is the absorbance the value of the sample with the p-anisidine solution and Ab is the absorbance the value of the sample without the p-anisidine solution.

TBA value determination

TBA value was determined according to a previously published procedure of AOAC method (AOAC, 1980). The sample (3 g) was mixed with 10 mL benzene and 2 mL TBA reagent (2-thiobarbituric acid 0.69 g + H2O 100 mL + acetic acid 100 mL); the resulting solution was then shaken for 4 min. After agitation 2 mL of the separate at bottom was added to 2 mL TBA solution in a test tube. The test tubes were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, after which absorbance at 530 nm was measured using UV-Vis spectrophotometry (Optizen POP, Mecasys Co. Ltd., Daejeon, Korea).

TBA = (A - B) ×3×100/weight of sample

where, A is the absorbance the value of the sample and B is the absorbance the value of the blank solution.

Statistical analysis

Each reported value is the mean of the three samples prepared for each test. The data were analysed by ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range tests. Statistical significance was accepted at a level of p < 0.05 (Lee et al., 1998).

Results and Discussion

Proximate composition of vegetable seeds

Table 1 shows the proximate composition of all test vegetable seeds. Each showed over 60% crude lipid content, and 15% crude protein content, and 3% of moisture content. The high concentration of crude lipids and proteins may be the source for various functional activities of vegetable seeds.

Table 1. Chemical composition of the tested perilla seeds, camellia seeds, pine seeds, flaxseeds and olive
Constituents Flaxseed Perilla seed Camellia seed Pine seed Olive
g/100 g
Moisture 7.3 8.3 3.3 3.4 3.3
Crude lipid 66.8 65.6 60.2 69.8 62.3
Crude protein1) 14.9 16.5 18.7 19.2 17.8
Crude ash 5.4 5.4 4.2 7.8 4.4

1) Calculation of protein content = Nitrogen (%) × 5.30.

Download Excel Table
Fatty acid composition

Table 2 shows the fatty acid composition of the tested VSOs, demonstrating fairly typical distribution. No differences in fatty acid compositions have been observed between corn, soybean, sesame and perilla seed oil in the past (Kurowska et al., 2003; Marina et al., 2009). The major fatty acid present in camellia seed and olive oil was oleic acid, at fatty acid concentration of 84.7 and 82.0 %, respectively, values that were in good agreement with previous results (Bianchi et al., 2003; Mateos et al., 2005; Qing et al., 2014). Perilla seed and flaxseed oil were notably composed of linolenic acid, at concentration of 45.5 and 59.7%, respectively, whereas pine seed oil showed linoleic acid in the highest concentration, at 48.3%. Camellia seed and olive oil were the least unsaturated, with extent of unsaturation values of 95.0 and 94.0, respectively, while flaxseed oil showed the highest value of 223.3. The extent of unsaturation correlates well with oxidative stability results from previous research (Lee et al., 2012). This is consistent with the notion that increased unsaturation increases susceptibility to oxidation.

Table 2. Fatty acid profile of the tested VSOs
Fatty acids Flaxseed oil Perilla seed oil Camellia seed oil Pine seed oil Olive oil
(g/100 g, %)
Palmitic acid (16:0) 5.3 (0.0)1) 9.8 (0.0) 8.1 (0.0) 4.2 (0.0) 9.0 (0.0)
Stearic acid (18:0) 2.7 (0.0) 2.6 (0.0) 1.9 (0.0) 1.8 (0.0) 3.0 (0.0)
Oleic acid (18:1) 18.2 (18.2) 25.3 (25.3) 84.7 (84.7) 24.1 (24.1) 82.0 (82.0)
Taxoleic acid (5,9-18:2) - - - 2.3 (4.6) -
Linoleic acid (9,12-18:2) 13.0 (26.0) 16.8 (33.6) 4.4 (8.8) 48.3 (96.6) 6.0 (12.0)
Pinolenic acid (5,9,12-18:3) - - - 14.1 (42.3) -
Linolenic acid (9,12,15-18:3) 59.7 (179.1) 45.5 (136.5) 0.5 (1.5) 0.2 (0.6) -
Extent of unsaturation1) (223.3) (195.4) (95.0) (168.2) (94.0)

1) Extent of unsaturation = number of double bonds ×total content of fatty acid.

Download Excel Table
POV

According to POV tests, VSO oxidative stability decreased with increasing storage temperature and time. After 35 d, all samples showed similar POVs with respect to each other given the same storage conditions (Fig. 1), with the POV rate constants increasing as a function of temperature for all oils regardless of storage conditions (Fig. 2). However, the extent of change for those samples exposed to O2 was significantly greater than for those that were not, indicating that O2 plays a larger role overall. For example, the POV rate constant for the flaxseed oil sample containing the O2 scavenger was about 4 times greater than that of the sample that simply sealed at 45 °C.

fep-21-1-49-g1
Fig. 1. Maximum POV of the tested vegetable oils stored for 35 d conditions.
Download Original Figure
fep-21-1-49-g2
Fig. 2. POV rate constants of the tested VSOs with respect to incubation temperature for 35 d. A: Non-O2 exposure with O2 scavenger, B: Non-O2 exposure, C: O2 exposure.
Download Original Figure

Overall, camellia seed oil showed the lowest POV rate constant for all storage conditions, while flaxseed oil showed the highest. All VSOs showed their highest POVs at 45 °C when exposed to O2. Similar results were mentioned (Lee et al., 1998; Shahina et al., 2005) for sesame seed, perilla seed, and olive oil (Yang et al., 1996; Valerity et al., 2016). Again, note that the degradation results are consistent with what would be expected given the extent of unsaturation of each oil.

IV tests are useful in that they indicate the extent to which the double bonds in the fatty acids are oxidized by iodine; generally, minimal change in IV for changes in temperature or storage conditions indicates increased stability. Overall, the IVs of the VSOs decreased, as temperature increased (Table 3). Generally, oxidation consists of a complex series of chemical reactions characterized by the formation of free radicals and a decrease in unsaturation due to hydrogen abstraction at the adjacent double bond. The observed decrease should therefore have been expected seeing how temperature reduces activation energy and increases molecular mobility. The control values that were obtained before storing the VSOs were in good agreement with the extent of unsaturation for each oil, suggesting a direct link between IV and fatty acid composition. Flaxseed, perilla seed and pine seed oil all showed a dramatic increase at 45 °C, a pattern that mirrors the POV data. However, pine seed oil showed a dramatic increase even at 37 °C under O2 exposure, a change that was not mirrored for POV. Again, IV rate constants were more affected by O2 than temperature; the lowest IV rate change was observed in samples at low temperature that were not exposed to O2, which likely resulted from removal of residual O2 by the O2 scavenger and the decreased molecular mobility of the oils (Yang et al., 1996).

Table 3. Maximum IVs for VSOs under different storage conditions
S . T3) Oil Control (Stored 0 day) Storage condition (g I2/100 g oil)
Non-O2 exposure with O2 scavenger Non-O2 exposure O2 exposure
30 Flaxseed oil 185.2±0.33a1)A2)(1.0)4) 180.8±0.33bA (2.4) 179.9±0.36bA (2.9) 177.0±0.37bcA (4.4)
Perilla seed oil 184.4±0.21aA (1.0) 181.2±0.22aA(1.7) 180.0±0.26abA (2.4) 178.0±0.09bA (3.5)
Camellia seed oil 79.2±0.18aD (1.0) 77.3±0.11aG(2.4) 76.8±0.48aF (3.0) 75.2±0.45abG (5.1)
Pine seed oil 130.9±0.46aB (1.0) 128.3±0.16aC (2.0) 127.0±0.27bC (3.0) 123.0±0.14bc D(6.0)
Olive oil 88.1±0.27aC (1.0) 86.0±0.25a E(2.4) 84.2±0.19bE (4.4) 82.8±0.37bF (6.0)
37 Flaxseed oil 185.2±0.33aA (1.0) 178.0±0.15bA(4.0) 177.0±0.24bA(4.4) 171.8±0.20cB(7.2)
Perilla seed oil 184.4±0.21aA (1.0) 179.8±0.19bA(2.5) 178.3±0.19bA(3.3) 174.8±0.38cB(5.2)
Camellia seed oil 79.2±0.18aD (1.0) 76.2±0.14bG(3.8) 75.3±0.15bF(4.9) 74.9±0.26bG(5.4)
Pine seed oil 130.9±0.46aB (1.0) 126±0.41bC (3.7) 124.8±0.37bC (4.7) 113.8±0.17cE (13.1)
Olive oil 88.1±0.27aC (1.0) 83.8±0.37bF(4.9) 82.0±0.37bE(6.9) 81.0±0.29bF(8.1)
45 Flaxseed oil 185.2±0.33aA) (1.0) 171.8±0.25bB(7.2) 170.3±0.47bB(8.0) 154.2±0.19cC(16.7)
Perilla seed oil 184.4±0.21aA (1.0) 172.3±0.46bB(6.6) 171.2±0.21bB(7.2) 157.0±0.46cC(14.9)
Camellia seed oil 79.2±0.18aD (1.0) 75.8±0.37bG(4.3) 74.9±0.28bF(5.4) 73.3±0.35bH(7.4)
Pine seed oil 130.9±0.46aB (1.0) 120.5±0.46bD (7.9) 118.6±0.37bD (9.4) 110.3±0.20bcE (15.7)
Olive oil 88.1±0.27aC (1.0) 82.1±0.27bF(6.8) 81.4±0.49bE(7.6) 80.1±0.50bF(9.1)

1) Mean±SD (n=3); a-c Superscriptive letters in a row indicate a significant difference at p<0.05 by Duncan's multiple comparison.

2) Mean±SD (n=3); A-H Superscriptive letters in a column indicate a significant difference at p<0.05 by Duncan's multiple comparison.

3) Storage temperature (°C).

4) Control value – (Experimental value/control value) × 100.

Download Excel Table
p-AnV

p-AnV can serve as an indicator for oxidative stability, with higher p-AnV indicating more products from oxidative processes; again, minimal change in this value when changing temperature or storage conditions is an indicator of increased stability. As shown in Table 4, this measure of oxidative stability provided results that were in line with both the other chemical tests and the fatty acid composition profile of the VSOs. Notably, by product formation in flaxseed oil stored at 45 °C and exposed to O2 was almost 1.5 times higher than that in the corresponding pine seed oil sample and 3 times higher than that in camellia seed oil.

Table 4. Maximum p-AnV for VSOs under different storage conditions
S . T 3) Oil Control (No storage) Storage condition
Non-O2 exposure with O2 scavenger Non-O2 exposure O2 exposure
30 Flaxseed oil 2.4±0.031b1)A2) 54.7±0.045aB 54.8±0.032aB 56.9±0.037aB
Perilla seed oil 1.7±0.035cC 28.2±0.033bDE 30.2±0.039abE 33.2±0.047aD
Camellia seed oil 1.5±0.046cD 15.5±0.036bH 17.7±0.026aH 18.4±0.037aH
Pine seed oil 2.1±0.019bB 25.2±0.019bF 25.5±0.042bF 29.6±0.039aEF
Olive oil 1.9±0.012cB 22.5±0.026aG 23.3±0.028aG 28.8±0.027aF
37 Flaxseed oil 2.4±0.031cA 55.9±0.035bA 56.6±0.046bA 59.6±0.025aA
Perilla seed oil 1.7±0.035bC 31.2±0.035aC 32.1±0.029aD 34.4±0.035aD
Camellia seed oil 1.5±0.036cD 16.8±0.041bH 17.8±0.047abH 20.3±0.088aG
Pine seed oil 2.1±0.019bB 30.5±0.040aD 31.3±0.028aD 31.7±0.041aE
Olive oil 1.9±0.012cB 27.28±0.029aE 30.7±0.024aE 31.3±0.025aE
45 Flaxseed oil 2.4±0.031bA 56.3±0.032aA 57.3±0.049aA 59.8±0.033aA
Perilla seed oil 1.7±0.035bC 37.8±0.035aB 38.9±0.033aC 39.9±0.035aC
Camellia seed oil 1.5±0.036bD 20.4±0.045aG 20.6±0.034aG 21.9±0.033aG
Pine seed oil 2.1±0.019bB 32.2±0.042aC 33.1±0.035aD 34.6±0.038aD
Olive oil 1.9±0.012cB 28.1±0.018bDE 32.2±0.016aD 32.9±0.049aE

1) Mean ± Standard deviation (n=3) ; a-c Superscriptive letters in a row indicate a significant difference at p<0.05 by Duncan's multiple comparison.

2) Mean ± Standard deviation (n=3); A-H Superscriptive letters in a column indicate a significant difference at p<0.05 by Duncan's multiple comparison.

3) Storage temperature (°C).

Download Excel Table

Overall, p-AnV changes were less affected by storage conditions, unlike the other test results. For example, the difference p-AnV between flaxseed oil samples stored at 45 °C and exposed to oxygen and stored at 30 °C and containing an O2 scavenger was only about 8%; the corresponding differences in IV and POV rate constants were 14.7% and 80.0%, respectively. Notably, camellia seed oil formed the fewest by products when compared to the control, while flaxseed oil showed the highest; this observation was in good agreement with both the other test results and previous reports (Yang et al., 1996; Kim et al., 2003; Papadimitriou et al., 2006).

TBA value

As shown in Table 5 and Fig. 3, flaxseed and perilla seed oil showed the highest change in TBA values, while olive and camellia seed oil showed the least with a difference of nearly 2 times between them for samples stored at 45 °C and exposed to O2. TBA values are frequently employed to track oil quality during storage as well as to assess products that had been stored for an unknown amount of time. In this assay, TBA reacts with malonaldehyde, a byproduct of lipid oxidation, to form a red complex which can be tracked by spectrophotometer. Higher values therefore reliably indicate less oxidative stability. Note that the TBA results are therefore in very good agreement with other tests. TBA values and rates were more affected by oil type, storage time and temperature than the other assays, an observation that is consistent with previous researches (Yang et al., 1996; Kim et al., 2003; Shahina et al., 2005).

Table 5. Maximum TBA values for VSOs under different storage conditions
S . T 3) Oil Control (No storage) Storage condition
Non-O2 exposure with O2 scavenger Non-O2 exposure O2 exposure
30 Flaxseed oil 0.2±0.01c1)A2) 0.5±0.09bA 0.5±0.09bA 0.6±0.10aB
Perilla seed oil 0.2±0.02cA 0.4±0.03bB 0.5±0.05aA 0.5±0.01aB
Camellia seed oil 0.1±0.02cB 0.2±0.01abC 0.2±0.02abD 0.3±0.04aD
Pine seed oil 0.2±0.03cA 0.4±0.04aB 0.4±0.04aB 0.4±0.08aC
Olive oil 0.1±0.02cB 0.3±0.01aC 0.3±0.01aC 0.3±0.08aD
37 Flaxseed oil 0.2±0.03cA 0.5±0.06bA 0.5±0.06bA 0.6±0.02aB
Perilla seed oil 0.2±0.01cA 0.5±0.01bA 0.5±0.01bA 0.6±0.09aB
Camellia seed oil 0.1±0.02cB 0.2±0.02bC 0.2±0.03bD 0.3±0.04aD
Pine seed oil 0.2±0.01cA 0.4±0.07bB 0.4±0.08bB 0.5±0.03aB
Olive oil 0.1±0.02cB 0.2±0.09bC 0.3±0.09aC 0.3±0.02aD
45 Flaxseed oil 0.2±0.05cA 0.6±0.03bA 0.6±0.07bA 0.7±0.10aA
Perilla seed oil 0.2±0.02cA 0.6±0.08bA 0.6±0.06bA 0.7±0.06aA
Camellia seed oil 0.1±0.02cB 0.3±0.04aB 0.3±0.05aC 0.3±0.06aD
Pine seed oil 0.2±0.01cA 0.4±0.05bB 0.5±0.07aA 0.5±0.03aB
Olive oil 0.1±0.09cB 0.3±0.05aC 0.3±0.02aC 0.3±0.03aD

1) Means±SD (n=3); a-cSuperscriptive letters in a row indicate a significant difference at p<0.05 by Duncan's multiple comparison.

2) Mean±SD (n=3); A-D Superscriptive letters in a column indicate a significant difference at p<0.05 by Duncan's multiple comparison.

3) Storage temperature (°C).

Download Excel Table
fep-21-1-49-g3
Fig. 3. TBA values for VSO samples incubated at 45°C with respect to time. A: Non-O2 exposure with O2 scavenger, B: Non-O2 exposure, C: O2 exposure.
Download Original Figure

Overall, oxidative stability generally decreased for increasing unsaturated fatty acid content. However, when oleic acid was the dominant unsaturated fatty acid, oxidation was inhibited. Oleic acid content may therefore be used as an indicator for the oxidative susceptibility of lipid during processing.

References

1.

AOAC. Official Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 198013th ed Washington DC, USA. .

2.

AOCS. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 19904th ed Champaign, USA. .

3.

Bianchi G, Pescara L. Lipids and phenols in table olives. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2003; 105:229-242.

4.

Concepcion SM, Jose AL, Fulgencio SC. A procedure to measure the antiradical efficiency of polyphenols. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1998; 76:270-276.

5.

Do E. Palm oil Biochemical, physiological, nutritional, hematological, and toxicological aspects : A review. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2002; 57:319-341.

6.

Hasmadi M, Mamost S, Radzuan T. Physicochemical characteristics of palm oil and sunflower oil blends fractionated at different temperatures. Food Chem. 2005; 91:731-736.

7.

Heliana de Azevedo G, Edir NS, Marcos Roberto Lopes N, Henrique TF. Evaluation of the 2-thiobarbituric acid methods for the measurement of lipid oxidation in mechanically deboned gamma irradiated chicken meat. Food Chem. 2003; 80:433-437.

8.

Josiah M, Quan H. Development of biolubricants from vegetable oils via chemical modification. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016; 36:1-12.

9.

Kurowska EM, Dresser GK, Deutsch L, Vachon D, Khalil W. Bioavailability of omega-3 essential fatty acids from perilla seed oil. Prostag. Leukotr. Ess. Fatty Acids. 2003; 68:207-212.

10.

Kim IH, Lee EC. Effects of red ginseng extract added to dough on the lipid oxidation of frying oil and fried dough during frying and storage. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2003; 12:67-71.

11.

Lee YC, Oh SW, Chang JH, Kim IH. Chemical composition and oxidative stability of safflower oil prepared from safflower seed roasted with different temperatures. Food Chem. 2004; 84:1-6.

12.

Long ZH, Wang DP. Chemical constituents of olive oil and from camellia oleifera seed oil. J. Chinese Cereals Oils Assoc. 2008; 23:121-123.

13.

Lee SW, Park HC, Her ES. Statistics and Data Analysis Method. 1998; Hyoil Press. Seoul, Korea: p. 253-296.

14.

Lee JW, Kim YT, Park JW, Rhee C. Antioxidation activity of oil extracts prepared from various seeds. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2012; 21:637-643.

15.

Marina AM, Che YB, Nazimah SA, Amin I. Chemical properties of virgin coconut oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2009; 86:301-307.

16.

Mateos R, Trujillo M, Perez-Camino MC, Moreda W, Cert A. Relationships between oxidative stability, triacylglycerol composition, and antioxidant content in olive oil matrices. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005; 53:5766 -5771.

17.

Papadimitriou V, Sotiroudis TG, Xenakis A, Sofikiti N, Stavyiannoudaki V, Chaniotakis NA. Oxidative stability and radical scavenging activity of extra virgin oils : An electron paramagnetic resonance spectro scopy study. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2006; 453-458:573-574.

18.

Qing FZ, Xue JJ, Qian QL, Rui WY, Li Z, Yong HZ, Chun BD. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of camellia oleifera seed oils. J. Appl. Biol Chem. 2014; 57:123-129.

19.

Shahina N, Hina S, Rahmanullah S. Deterioration of olive, corn and soybean oils due to air, ligh, heat and deepfrying. Food Res. Int. 2005; 38:127-134.

20.

Valerity ID, Lyudmila IK, Vasyl IP. An accessible method for evaluation of the thermo-oxidative stability of organic substrates based on vegetable oils. Thermochim Acta. 2016; 632:91-93.

21.

Wagner KH, Elmadfa I. Effects of tocopherols and their mixtures on the oxidative stability of olive oil and linseed oil under heating. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2000; 102:624-629.

22.

Yoon HR, Paik YS. Radical-scavenging activities of four quinochalcones of safflower. J. Korean. Soc. Appl Biol.Chem. 2008; 51:346-348.

23.

Yang WY, Pyo YH, Ahn MS. Oxidative stability and sensory evaluation of camellia oil. J. Korean. Soc. Food Sci. 1996; 12:367-371.