Table 5 Acceptance test of ball-eomuk with the experimental design
No.1) | Responses |
Color (Y5) | Flavor (Y6) | Off- flavor (Y7) | Taste (Y8) | Hardness (Y9) | Cohesiveness (Y10) | Springiness (Y11) | Chewiness (Y12) | Overall acceptance (Y13) |
1 | 5.00±0.63ns2) | 3.91±0.94c | 4.09±1.30bcd | 4.00±1.00bc | 3.27±0.65d | 4.09±0.54ab | 4.09±0.70abc | 4.36±1.03ab | 4.09±0.70cd |
2 | 4.27±1.01 | 4.27±0.90bc | 3.00±0.89d | 4.09±0.70bc | 3.45±1.13d | 3.64±1.29b | 3.27±0.79c | 3.55±1.21b | 3.64±0.92d |
3 | 4.82±1.17 | 4.45±0.82bc | 3.36±1.69d | 4.45±1.21bc | 5.27±1.19ab | 4.18±0.98ab | 4.91±1.30a | 4.36±1.12ab | 4.55±0.93cd |
4 | 4.64±1.03 | 4.09±0.70bc | 3.64±1.29cd | 4.55±1.75bc | 4.55±0.04bc | 4.45±1.13ab | 4.55±1.04ab | 4.18±0.98ab | 4.09±1.22cd |
5 | 5.73±0.90 | 5.73±1.01a | 5.36±0.81a | 5.18±1.25ab | 5.36±1.50ab | 5.18±1.40a | 5.09±1.22a | 5.09±1.14a | 6.64±1.29a |
6 | 4.55±1.51 | 4.45±1.04bc | 3.18±0.87d | 3.36±1.86c | 4.18±1.40cd | 3.82±0.87b | 3.64±1.50bc | 3.64±1.63b | 4.64±0.92cd |
7 | 5.18±0.87 | 5.55±1.13a | 5.18±1.66ab | 5.91±1.22a | 5.73±1.01a | 5.18±1.08a | 4.64±0.67ab | 5.09±0.94a | 6.00±1.34ab |
8 | 4.82±0.87 | 5.00±1.18ab | 4.64±0.92abc | 4.00±1.26bc | 3.82±0.87cd | 3.64±1.12b | 3.64±0.92bc | 3.36±1.03b | 4.00±1.00d |
9 | 5.00±1.00 | 4.82±0.87abc | 4.09±1.51bcd | 5.09±1.04ab | 4.73±1.10abc | 4.36±0.81ab | 5.00±1.10a | 4.00±1.10ab | 5.09±1.22bc |
10 | 5.45±0.93 | 4.91±1.04ab | 5.36±1.57a | 4.91±1.30ab | 5.27±1.19ab | 5.09±1.30a | 5.09±1.22a | 5.00±1.00a | 5.91±1.14ab |
11 | 5.27±1.10 | 4.91±1.04ab | 4.82±1.17abc | 4.27±0.79bc | 4.55±1.21bc | 4.45±1.51ab | 4.27±1.35abc | 4.27±1.19ab | 5.09±1.22bc |
1)The number of experiment conditions by central composite design for manufacture.
2)All values are mean±SD.
a-dMeans with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different at p<0.05 by Duncan’s multiple range test.